Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided September 9, 2003No. 06-03-00003-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice CORNELIUS

(Retired).

Jerry Dean Mayfield was convicted, in a jury trial, of delivery of cocaine. The jury assessed his punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at ten years’ imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine.

On appeal, Mayfield raises only one issue. He contends the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion to abandon certain portions of the indictment. He contends the State’s abandonment actually amounted to an amendment of the indictment and was improper according to Tex. Code CRiM. PROC. Ann. art. 28.10 (Vernon 1989). We disagree and affirm the judgment.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Eastep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Diemer v. Commonwealth, Transportation Cabinet, Department of HighwaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chavis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  2. Alston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  3. Brian Keith Edwards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
  4. Briscoe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. Bryan Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API