Electric City Brick Co. v. Minter
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Where a contract provides that one of the parties is to furnish plans and specifications for construction work to be performed by the other party, and expressly limits the use of the plans to the particular construction work described, and where the party entitled to the use of the plans expressly agrees to confine the use of them to the construction work described, and agrees not to use them upon any other construction work than that described, this provision of the contract is not in restraint of trade and is not against public policy.
2. In a suit by the party furnishing the plans…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kenny v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Mills v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Graham & Ward v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Sampson v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James v. Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Kinzy v. WaddellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Webb v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Mancuso v. SantucciDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949