Legal Opinion

Kinzy v. Waddell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1948No. 16212PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

1. “When a vendee under a warranty deed has fairly and reasonably paid a sum of money to remove an encumbrance which was outstanding, and was a legal and valid lien on the land at the time of his purchase, he may recover the amount thus paid from his vendors.” Amos v. Cosby, 74 Ga. 793; McEntyre v. Merritt, 49 Ga. App. 416 (175 S. E. 661). This court has recognized the right of a vendee to recover an amount paid in partial discharge of an outstanding encumbrance. In Cheatham v. Palmer, 176 Ga. 227, 236 (167 S. E. 522), a petitioner alleged the payment of one of ten instalments…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Tifton Produce Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Amos v. CosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. James v. Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. McEntyre v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Drug Emporium, Inc. v. PeaksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Empire Banking Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Hitchcock v. TollisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Pendley v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Paulding County Board of Commissioners v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API