Kinzy v. Waddell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
1. “When a vendee under a warranty deed has fairly and reasonably paid a sum of money to remove an encumbrance which was outstanding, and was a legal and valid lien on the land at the time of his purchase, he may recover the amount thus paid from his vendors.” Amos v. Cosby, 74 Ga. 793; McEntyre v. Merritt, 49 Ga. App. 416 (175 S. E. 661). This court has recognized the right of a vendee to recover an amount paid in partial discharge of an outstanding encumbrance. In Cheatham v. Palmer, 176 Ga. 227, 236 (167 S. E. 522), a petitioner alleged the payment of one of ten instalments…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cheatham v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Tifton Produce Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Amos v. CosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- James v. Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- McEntyre v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Drug Emporium, Inc. v. PeaksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Empire Banking Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Hitchcock v. TollisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Pendley v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Paulding County Board of Commissioners v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.