Legal Opinion

Kandelin v. Kandelin

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 14, 1942No. Civil No. 17385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

This- is a proceeding to review a decision of the Social Security Board which held that Amanda S. Kandelin, as guardian-in-fact of Charles V. Kandelin, was not entitled to a lump-sum death benefit under the Social Security Act Amendments of August 10, 1939, 53 Stat. 1362, 42 U.S.C.A. ■ § 401.

Jurisdiction to entertain the action is conferred, it would seem, by section 205 (g) of the amended Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g); although; the defendant refutes this interpretation- of the section cited.

The defendant having filed its answer, the case is now'at issue. The defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of LindewallNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Richard v. LazardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. In re the Estate of BrowningNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. Carroll v. Social Security BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ruby J. Burrow v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. Colbert v. HobbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Blue Cross Ass'n v. CalifanoDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
  4. Walker v. AltmeyerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API