Legal Opinion
In Re the Will of Lindewall
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1942PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
There have been certified to us by the Appellate Division two questions. The first is:
“ 1. Should the answer be stricken out and the objection to probate dismissed upon the ground that, upon the facts contained in the record, the respondent as matter of law was not the husband of the deceased at the time of her death? ”
On June 27, 1937, the decedent, Marguerite Lindewall, married the objectant, John Paul Bathelt, Jr., in the State of New York and they lived in New York city until June, 1938. Decedent had always been and continued to be until her death on March 6,1939, a resident of and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Avery v. . EverettNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- May v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Troup v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re FeinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
- Claim of Pallas v. Misericordia HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Ferrin v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Urbano v. News Syndicate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Supreme Court · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.