De Haley v. Haley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The court below should have sustained the demurrer to the complaint.
The action is for divorce. The complaint avers the defendant was guilty of extreme cruelty, in that, in another action brought by her against him, he filed an affidavit containing statements of want of chastity on her part prior to their marriage; and in that, in an action brought by him against her, he filed a complaint charging that prior to the marriage of these parties she was pregnant by another man. The complaint herein avers that the statements of defendant, in the affidavit and complaint referred to were wholly false…
2Cited by9 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Mott v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wadsworth v. WadsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Berdolt v. BerdoltNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Klemmer v. KlemmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.