Beals Et Ux. v. Robertson Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
Plaintiffs filed a bill in equity to enjoin defendants from discharging mine waters which reached plaintiffs’ land. The court below made findings of fact, conclusions of law and a nisi decree dismissing the bill. No exceptions were filed. The appeal assigns the final decree, dismissing the bill, as error.
Under equity rules 69 and 72 the only question before us is whether the findings of fact support the decree: Schwartz v. Wesoky, 281 Pa. 388, 126 A. 779; Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co. et al., 280 Pa. 449, 452, 124 A. 650.
Plaintiffs’ land is lower…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kauffman v. GriesemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Schwartz v. WesokySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Taylor v. Canton TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co. v. Pittston Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rau v. Wilden Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- DePIETRO v. TRIANOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Taylor v. Harrison Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955