Legal Opinion

Rau v. Wilden Acres, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1954No. Appeal, 41PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

This controversy is concerned with facts rather than law. It is an action by a landowner to enjoin the owner of higher, neighboring land from artificially draining surface water from his property onto that of the plaintiff.

From a multitude of authorities 1 the applicable law may be summarized as follows:

A landowner may not alter the natural flow of surface water on his property by concentrating it in an artificial channel and discharging it upon the lower land of his neighbor even though no more water is thereby collected than would naturally have…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. GriesemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Strauss v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Chamberlin v. CiaffoniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Pfeiffer v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Rielly v. StephensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kowalski, B. v. TOA PA V, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Laform v. Bethlehem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Westbury Realty Corp. v. Lancaster Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Leiper v. Heywood-Hall Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Piekarski v. Club Overlook Estates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API