Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Flohr

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1983No. 83CA0135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Chief Judge.

In this garnishment proceeding, garnishee, Empire Savings and Loan, seeks a reversal of the trial court judgment entered in favor of Jacob Flohr, garnishor. We affirm.

Jacob Flohr sought to enforce a judgment obtained against Marie Flohr by serving a writ of garnishment on Empire. At the time the writ was served on Empire, Marie Flohr had a revocable savings account trust with Empire, which had been in existence before Jacob Flohr became a creditor. This account was of the type known as a Totten Trust; Marie Flohr was trustee, and she had reserved to herself the right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Susman v. Exchange National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Vickers v. LavineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. City of Denver v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Prestige Vacations, Inc. v. KozakDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Guaranty Residential Insurance Co. v. DimmickColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Hoyman v. CoffinColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Soto v. First Gibraltar Bank, FSB San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API