Murphy v. Murphy
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Burnett, Judge:
In this domestic litigation, the family court judge (1) determined that Appellant’s entire pension fund constituted marital property; (2) determined that Appellant’s investment account, as well as the income produced from it, constituted marital property, and divided the account equally between the parties; (3) ordered sequestration of the investment account; and (4) denied Appellant’s motion for recusal. We affirm.
FACTS
Rosemary and James Murphy were married in November of 1968. They have two children. Mr. Murphy was employed as a corporate attorney with the Martin-Marietta…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ellis v. PROCTER AND GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Roche v. Young Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Townsend v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Wilburn v. WilburnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Chanko v. ChankoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.