Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Murphy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 7, 1995No. 24295PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burnett, Judge:

In this domestic litigation, the family court judge (1) determined that Appellant’s entire pension fund constituted marital property; (2) determined that Appellant’s investment account, as well as the income produced from it, constituted marital property, and divided the account equally between the parties; (3) ordered sequestration of the investment account; and (4) denied Appellant’s motion for recusal. We affirm.

FACTS

Rosemary and James Murphy were married in November of 1968. They have two children. Mr. Murphy was employed as a corporate attorney with the Martin-Marietta…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellis v. PROCTER AND GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Townsend v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Wilburn v. WilburnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Chanko v. ChankoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API