Legal Opinion
United States v. Bernard E. Roessling, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 30, 1960No. 17857_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Chief Judge.
The United States sought to collect a loan and to that end to foreclose a mortgage on real property. It obtained an in personam judgment against the mortgagors for the debt, but was denied foreclosure on the property. It appeals from such denial.
The Government loan was made pursuant to the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 115, and to the President’s Executive Order No. 7027, issued April 30, 1935, delegating to the Resettlement Administration the power to make loans under said Act. It was secured by a mortgage on real property owned by the mortgagors in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. BrosnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- S. R. A., Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City of New Brunswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., Lummus Company v. Honorable Archie O. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Matagorda County v. Russell LawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Pauline Rust v. Paul Johnson and Nora Johnson, City of Los Angeles v. Paul Johnson, Nora Johnson, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- W. T. Jones and Company, Incorporated, and Noland Company, Inc., and Marvin Moseley v. Foodco Realty, Inc., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Kimbell Foods, Inc. v. Republic National Bank Of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.