Legal Opinion
Holder v. Crofton
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided August 31, 2022No. 5:21-cv-01029Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION RAGAN HOLDER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. SA-21-CV-01029-JKP HAROLD BRANNAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Harold Brannan’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Ragan Holder’s negligence per se claim, and the parties’ responsive briefings. ECF Nos. 17, 18, 19. After due consideration of the briefings, record, and applicable law, the Court GRANTS Brannan’s Motion. Holder’s negligence per se claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Holder’s negligence claim shall proceed.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.