Legal Opinion

Heidenheimer v. Bauman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1892No. 3347PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTOE", Chief Justice.

— The discussion of this case depends on the effect to be given to a clause in the will of Samson Heidenheimer. The entire will is as follows:

“1. I direct that all my just debts shall be paid.

‘ ‘ 2 Besides the property which I heretofore donated and gave to my wife Anna Heidenheimer, and which consists of two notes executed by Abe Heidenheimer, and indorsed by M. Lasker, aggregating $28,000, also a note executed by ¡Nelson Davis & Co. for $1200, certain bank stock held by me in a bank at Austin for $2500, a note of one Bosenberg for $1500, and my life insurance,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olliffe v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Sears v. HardyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Nichols v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Hinson v. HinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Adams v. MarisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Reynolds v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Sellers v. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Pickelner v. Adler, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API