Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johansen v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1984No. Nos. 83-5965, 83-6065Published

1DissentChoy, Senior Circuit Judge

The majority cannot uphold the district court’s “hiatus” injunction for two reasons, neither of which I find persuasive. I conclude that the 10(7) injunction was proper in light of this court’s recent decision in Miller v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, 708 F.2d 467 (9th Cir. 1983). The Miller court held that “[i]n some cases a temporary ban on all picketing may be appropriate.” Id. at 472. The court explained that a brief hiatus under section 10(l) is appropriate “only when presumptively legitimate picketing would perpetuate the effects of prior illegal activity.” Id. at 471. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  3. Ali Galeb Ahmed v. American Steamship Mutual Protection & Indemnity AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re BildiscoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Clifford W. Potter, Regional Director of Region 23 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. Houston Gulf Coast Building Trades Council, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API