Ali Galeb Ahmed v. American Steamship Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants are twenty-six seamen who, after obtaining default judgments against their employer shipping companies for damages for personal injuries, directly sued appellee, the insurance carrier for all the employers. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant carrier on the ground that New York Insurance Law § 167(4) precludes appellants’ direct action suit against the insurer. We affirm in part and remand in part.
Plaintiffs-appellants are injured merchant seamen who served on vessels owned by three companies, collectively referred to as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State Trading Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Assuranceforeningen SkuldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In Re: Prudential Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Bohemia, Inc. v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Continental Oil Company v. Bonanza Corporation and Republic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Quinlan v. Liberty Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.