City of Sacramento v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wm. B. Bosley, Thos. J. Straub, and L. T. Hatfield, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant, operating an electric street railway in the city of Sacramento, undertook to construct across K Street in that city two tracks, directly connecting its existing tracks on Tenth Street, which extended north and south from K Street. The accompanying diagram will facilitate an understanding of the situation:
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS MAP IS ELECTRONICALLY NON-TRANSFERRABLE.]
K Street extends east and west and upon it, across Tenth Street, defendant has for many years operated its railway. Approaching Tenth Street along K from the west there is at Tenth Street a curve to the right and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Fanning v. . OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.