Lee v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The indictment apparently represents an effort on the part of the State to charge one misdemeanor in two counts, stating the same offense in two different ways, and it is observed that in such a case • only one punishment could legally be imposed, and that, the jury having found the defendant guilty on both counts, it would not matter so far as conviction or sentence is concerned if one count of the indictment were bad and the other good. This indictment is drawn in two counts, and the fact that such counts are not numbered does not affect the validity…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Loyd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Durden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Tarver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Staples v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Braxton v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Holtzendorf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- People v. ToneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.