Legal Opinion · Dissent

First Hudson Capital, LLC v. Seaborn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 5, 2008Published

1Dissent

Saxe and Gonzalez, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Saxe, J., as follows: The question presented on this appeal is whether Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2525.7 (b), which prohibits a tenant in a rent-stabilized apartment from charging a roommate more than his or her proportionate share of the legal rent, permits a landlord to evict the tenant when a violation of this provision is established. I would affirm the holding of Appellate Term, First Department, which applied the rule it has developed through its own common-law jurisprudence since enactment of that provision—that the remedy of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. BLF Realty Holding Corp. v. KasherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Roughton-HesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. West 148 LLC v. YonkeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
  5. 54 Greene Street Realty Corp. v. ShookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API