Legal Opinion
Smith v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 2001No. CIV.A. 99-1707PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
CINDRICH, District Judge.
This is a case for damages arising out of a residential fire started by plaintiffs’ three-year-old child using a butane utility lighter manufactured by defendants. On November 2, 2001, we issued a memorandum order that addressed defendants’ motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of our dismissal of their products liability claim, and defendants’ motion to strike plaintiffs’ supplemental pretrial statement. Pending is defendants’ motion for reconsideration.
IPlaintiffs Negligence Claim
Defendants argue that the court erred by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Portia Motter, and Lawrence Motter, H/w v. Everest & Jennings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Michael SURACE; Alice Surace, H/w, Appellants, v. CATERPILLAR, INC.; CMI Corporation, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Metzgar v. Playskool Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Hittle v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schalliol v. FareDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002