Legal Opinion

Fare v. Doe

Chesterfield County Circuit Court

Decided September 13, 2004No. Case No. CL04-442PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Cleo E. Powell

On July 26,2004, that parties appeared by counsel and argued Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Immediate Disclosure of Surveillance Documents and Tape. The Court took this matter under advisement. After reviewing the argument, memoranda, and case law filed, as well as all relevant case and statutory law, the Court rules as follows.

Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendant to produce a surveillance video relied on by Dr. Roger Giordano in performing an Independent Medical Examination of Plaintiff. The Court has not been apprised of the contents of the video except that according to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadVirginia Circuit Court · 1991
  2. Fender v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2001
  3. McIntyre v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1990
  4. Runions v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 2000
  5. Moore v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Popina v. Rice-StewardVirginia Beach County Circuit Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API