Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLevin, J.
I concur in Part I of Justice Swainson’s opinion but dissent as to Part II.
In 1962, Edward Hakala suffered a compensable injury while working for Burroughs Corporation. He suffered the loss of his right hand and portions of the first and second fingers of his left hand. Burroughs Corporation voluntarily paid workmen’s compensation benefits for these specific losses.
In 1968, Hakala filed for second injury benefits (§ 8a of Part II of the Act) claiming that when he suffered the compensable injury resulting in loss of a hand he had a "permanent disability in the form of the loss of a[n] * * *…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cline v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Verberg v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Lindsay v. Glennie Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Hirschkorn v. Fiege Desk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Sprute v. Herlihy Mid-Continent Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.