Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Michelson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 1, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.(1) The motion of the ancillary administrator to strike out the amended objections to the account filed by the creditor, on the ground that they set forth “ causes of action ” which are not the same as stated in the claim theretofore filed with him as representative of the estate, is denied. I hold that a notice of claim presented to a representative is not a pleading. It is merely a formal notice required by the statute to be given to a representative, setting forth the claimant’s demand against the estate. (Matter of Gentry, 139 Misc. 759, 767.) As stated in Matter of Morton (58 N.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of HearnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Accounts of Proceedings of Bank of New York & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. In re the Estate of GentryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GerbereuxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of SchorerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Accounting of AquinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  4. In re the Estate of ThompsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. Claim of Weil v. Estate of RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API