People v. Hillhouse
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Jackson. (Peck, J.)< Eespondent was convicted of larceny. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
The defendant was convicted of the larceny of a horse. The horse was owned by Edwin F. Hillhouse, a son of defendant, who brought the horse from Ohio for the purpose of putting him into the races. Soon after reaching Michigan, the horse got badly out of ■condition, and his owner was obliged to put up the entry fees, and, being impecunious, borrowed money from Mr. John W. Boardman, and gave- him a mortgage upon the horse. Defendant is a veterinary surgeon, who was then residing in Ohio, and at his son’s solicitation he came to Jackson, and treated the horse, with a view of curing him of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. QuickMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Commonwealth v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. McGillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.