Legal Opinion

People v. Hillhouse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1890PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Jackson. (Peck, J.)< Eespondent was convicted of larceny. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the larceny of a horse. The horse was owned by Edwin F. Hillhouse, a son of defendant, who brought the horse from Ohio for the purpose of putting him into the races. Soon after reaching Michigan, the horse got badly out of ■condition, and his owner was obliged to put up the entry fees, and, being impecunious, borrowed money from Mr. John W. Boardman, and gave- him a mortgage upon the horse. Defendant is a veterinary surgeon, who was then residing in Ohio, and at his son’s solicitation he came to Jackson, and treated the horse, with a view of curing him of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. QuickMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. People v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Commonwealth v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. McGillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API