People v. Quick
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Information for larceny from the person. Respondent brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Respondent was convicted of stealing a watch from the person of one David'Wright. The case was before us on conviction upon a former trial, which was set aside on a single ground, on the supposition that the prosecution would on a second trial avoid other errors which we did not think it necessary to dwell on. 51 Mich. 54Y. A further trial was had, and the case comes up again upon several assignments of error, which are within well-settled rules of law. We shall not take them all up in course, but point out such as may be grouped together.
Wo have held on several occasions that the defendant…
2Cited by79 opinions
- People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. McGillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FarrarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. HumphreysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.