Legal Opinion

People v. Quick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1885PublishedCited by 79 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Information for larceny from the person. Respondent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Respondent was convicted of stealing a watch from the person of one David'Wright. The case was before us on conviction upon a former trial, which was set aside on a single ground, on the supposition that the prosecution would on a second trial avoid other errors which we did not think it necessary to dwell on. 51 Mich. 54Y. A further trial was had, and the case comes up again upon several assignments of error, which are within well-settled rules of law. We shall not take them all up in course, but point out such as may be grouped together.

Wo have held on several occasions that the defendant…

2Cited by79 opinions

  1. People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. McGillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FarrarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. HumphreysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API