Legal Opinion

Gershman v. Barted Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Eilperin, J.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage both sides move for summary judgment. Plaintiff has elected to invoke the acceleration clause of paragraph 14 of the mortgage. It reads as follows: “ 14. That the whole of said *462principal sum and the interest shall become due at the option of the mortgagee: (a) after failure to exhibit to the mortgagee, within 10 days after demand, receipts showing payment of all the taxes, water rates, sewer rents and assessments * * *.”

On November 5,1959 plaintiff’s attorneys wrote to defendant: “ Will you please deliver to me receipts showing payments of all New York…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Insurance v. DoveTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Zimmerman v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. Williams v. Wisner Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gil Enterprises, Inc. v. DelvyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Duskin v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Duskin v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Duskin v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gil Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Richard Delvy, Doing Business as Miraleste Music, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Richard Delvy, Counter-Claimant v. Gil Enterprises, Inc., Counter-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API