Legal Opinion

Bai v. Sherwin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 21, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2021-0390Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JIEMIN BAI ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21-cv-390 (TSC) ) MATTHEW M. GRAVES, United States ) Attorney of the District of Columbia, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Jiemin Bai filed this civil action, pro se, alleging tort injuries pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) violations, and civil rights violations under

42 U.S.C. §§ 1981

and 1983 against the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia in his official capacity, and former U.S. Attorney Jessie…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API