Legal Opinion
Harris v. Jackson
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 2, 1939No. 73PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
On March 13, 1939, plaintiff filed herein his motion denominated “Motion For Leave To File A Complaint of Review,” attaching thereto a copy of said proposed complaint which had for its objects the vacation and setting aside of two former judgments of this Court, namely, decree entered April 18, 1932 in No. 3948 Equity-Consolidated, and decree entered May 3, 1934 in No; 4537 Equity-Consolidated. On the same day, the court, acting upon said motion without notice to the defendants named in the complaint, granted leave and the plaintiff filed his complaint in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Fay v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Madden v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Donohue v. Boston & M. R. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nathaniel JAMES Et Al., Appellees, v. the BEAUFORT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a Public Body Corporate, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Nathaniel JAMES Et Al., Appellees, v. the BEAUFORT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a Public Body Corporate, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972