Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Nathaniel JAMES Et Al., Appellees, v. the BEAUFORT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a Public Body Corporate, Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1972No. 72-1065Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBlatt, District Judge

Reserving the question of the allowance of attorneys’ fees, the majority opinion affirms the Order of the District Court. Although I have the greatest respect for the wide and varied experience of the majority of this panel in matters similar to that here involved, I find myself unable to agree with all aspects of the majority opinion, and I, therefore, respectfully dissent from that part of the majority opinion which sustains the District Court’s determination that the defendant-appellant, Beaufort County Board of Education, has discriminated in the employment and assignment of black…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Marvin W. BROWN, Appellant, v. GASTON COUNTY DYEING MACHINE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  5. Joseph Edward Massie, Jr. v. Stanley Henry, Chairman of Board of Education of Haywood County, N. C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API