Legal Opinion

Darnold v. Voges

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1956No. Civ. 21108PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendants demand the reversal of a judgment for damages allegedly resulting from personal injuries suffered when a cow kicked and fell upon plaintiff. They contend (1) the judgment is without evidentiary support; (2) prejudical errors were made in rulings upon the admissibility of certain evidence; (3) certain instructions were prejudicial.

The Voges brothers, appellants, operated a dairy farm under the name of Inglewood Farms, 1 near Torrance, where they processed milk purchased from divers milk producers. The elaborate processing plant included a barn which appellants had leased to John…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merrill v. BuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Johnson v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Endresen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Suarez v. Pacific Northstar Mechanical, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Lovett v. HitchcockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API