General Electric Co. v. George J. Hagan Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
In the opinion filed in this ease November 14, 1929 [38 F.(2d) 995], the court said: “Holding as we have, that the Collins patent, No. 1,310,060 is valid and has been infringed by the defendant, let a decree, be prepared and submitted in accordance with the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and this opinion.” Plaintiff in pursuance thereof has submitted a decree and claims that it is entitled to recover profits and damages. This is denied by defendant on the ground that plaintiff has failed to comply with the Revised Statutes, § 4900, title 35, section 49, of the United States Code.
In the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Parker Rust Proof Co. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1928
- Franklin Brass Foundry Co. v. Shapiro & Aronson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Condit Electrical Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Horvath v. McCord Radiator & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Briggs v. Wix CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- Federal Machine & Welder Co. v. Mesta Machine Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Horvath v. McCord Radiator & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938