Legal Opinion · Concurrence
STATE v. TERRY
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 2014No. F-2013-607Published
1Concurrence
*958LUMPKIN, Judge:
specially concurring.
T1 I concur in the Court's decision to affirm the Judgment and Sentence in this case but write separately to address the following.
12 First, I note that this Court interprets Article II, § 30 of the Oklahoma Constitution the same as the Supreme Court interprets the Fourth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. State v. Sittingdown, 2010 OK CR 22, ¶ 17, 240 P.3d 714, 718; State v. McNeal, 2000 OK CR 13, ¶10, 6 P.3d 1055, 1057. Both provisions contain almost the exact same wording, and in substance are identical. MceNeal, 2000 OK CR 13, §10, 6 P.3d at 1057;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert JubicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.