Legal Opinion

Conn v. Quality Inn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1990No. 89-555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

The Montana Department of Labor and Industry, Workers’ Compensation Division, ruled that the statute of limitations barred respondent Anita M. Conn’s compensation claim. The Workers’ Compensation Court reversed that decision, and her employer, Quality Inn, and its insurer, the State Compensation Insurance Fund, now appeal. We affirm.

The appellants raise the single issue of whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in holding that the claimant was entitled to an extension of the statute of limitations under § 39-71-601(2), MCA (1985), because she did not become aware of her disability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thiel v. TAURUS DRILLING LTD. 1980-IIMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bowerman v. Employment Security CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Swan Corp. v. Montana Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wear v. Buttrey Foods Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dodd v. Champion International Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tieszen v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Tinker v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Tieszen v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API