Legal Opinion

Gillis v. Mass. Cablevision, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

Community antenna television (CATV) systems are regulated under G. L. c. 166A, inserted by St. 1971, c. 1103, § 1. Section 41 of c. 1103 is a “grandfather clause,” protecting any person who had previously “received a license or permit for construction and operation” of a CATV system. We are asked to determine whether a license issued to the defendant Mass. Cable-*528vision, Inc. (the licensee), by the board of selectmen of the town of Falmouth (the board) is such a “license or permit.” We hold that it is, and reverse the contrary judgment appealed from.

The action was begun in the Superior Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Insurance Rating Board v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. TV Pix, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1968
  5. TV Pix, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cablevision of Boston, Inc. v. Public Improvement CommissionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. Hebb v. LamportMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  3. Warner Cable of Massachusetts Inc. v. Community Antenna Television CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. W. Barrington Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  5. Gillis v. Mass. Cablevision, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API