Legal Opinion
Hugunin v. Thatcher
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
Decided July 1, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.
The defendant asks for an order compelling the complainant, who is a non-resident, to file security for costs. The application is opposed solely on the ground that it is made too late; the demand for security being served five days after the answer was filed. The provisions of the Bevised Statutes of New York relating to security for costs, (now sections 8268-3278 of the Codo of Civil Procedure,) are adopted by this court. Buie 4, Cir. Ct.; Buie 64, Dist. Gt.; Gonkl. Treat. (5th Ed.) 468; Lyman Ventilating, etc., Co. v. Southard, 12 Blatchf. 405.
It will be seen, upon an examination of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. SinclairCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Burgess v. GregoryNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
- Lyman Ventilating & Refrigerator Co. v. SouthardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1875
- Northrop v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1845
3Cited by2 opinions
- Silvas v. Arizona Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Winkley Co. v. Bowen Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1910