Northrop v. Wright
New York Supreme Court
Motion by defendant that plaintiff file security for costs in this cause.— The defendant, William Wright, served on plaintiff, Rodolphus E. Northrop, a claim under the act entitled, “ Proceedings to compel the determination of claims to real property in certain cases,” part 3, chapter 5, title 2, of the Revised Statutes, on the 24th December, 1833. On the 9th August, 1843, an order was made by this court1"as follows : “ William Wright, demandant vs. Rodolphus E. Northrop,…
Read the full summary
Motion by defendant that plaintiff file security for costs in this cause.— The defendant, William Wright, served on plaintiff, Rodolphus E. Northrop, a claim under the act entitled, “ Proceedings to compel the determination of claims to real property in certain cases,” part 3, chapter 5, title 2, of the Revised Statutes, on the 24th December, 1833. On the 9th August, 1843, an order was made by this court1"as follows : “ William Wright, demandant vs. Rodolphus E. Northrop, claimant." On motion on the part of demandant, ordered that the default of said Rodolphus be and the same is hereby…
1Opinion of the Court
Bronson, Chief Justice.
Considered it the ordinary case for security for costs, and refused to increase the amount.
The usual order entered for plaintiff to file security for costs, absolute.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hugunin v. ThatcherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1883