Legal Opinion

Mahon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1962No. Gen. 48,535PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE BRYANT

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a chancery action for the reformation of an automobile insurance policy in order to reform the effective date of the policy from August 10, 1953 to August 8, 1953. The action was originally instituted in October, 1954 as a suit at law by plaintiffs Bentcliff and Skubick. The suit was amended into an action in chancery and Robert Mahon and Wanda Mahon were added as nominal plaintiffs, while State Farm’s agent Robert Soffel was added as a defendant. The cause was referred to a Master who took testimony, received evidence and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beddow v. HicksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  2. Firemen's Insurance v. KuessnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Krabbenhoft v. GossauIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Service v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Commonwealth v. McDonnoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Buck v. Mountain States Investment CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Murphy v. UrsoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Estate of Blakely v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Friedman v. Development Management Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. American Employers Insurance Company v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API