Beddow v. Hicks
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Riess
delivered the opinion of the court.
Appellees John and Edward Beddow, father and son, filed suit in equity to reform certain provisions of a fire insurance policy issued by defendant appellant, the Continental Insurance Company of the city of New York, by correcting an alleged mutual mistake of fact in the issuance thereof in the name of defendant Robert F. Hicks, instead of “John Beddow, Edward Beddow and Robert F. Hicks, as their interests may appear” and praying judgment thereon in the sum of $1,000 and accrued interest.
The cause was referred to the master in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Phenix Insurance v. StocksIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Continental Insurance v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Phenix Insurance v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Home Insurance Co. of New York v. MendenhallIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. EvistonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Zannini v. Reliance Insurance of Illinois, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Stoltz v. National Indemnity Co. of OmahaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Lititz Mutual Ins. Co. v. MILLERMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- New York Life Ins. v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.