Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 22, 2009No. 2D08-2834PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Judge.

The State appeals the circuit court’s order suppressing statements made by the defendant, Arthur Lee Hunt, in response to a custodial interrogation conducted after Mr. Hunt had reinitiated dialogue with detectives following his initial invocation of his right to remain silent under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). 1 Because the circuit court applied the incorrect law in determining whether the statements should be suppressed, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. THE FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On October 31, 2007, Mr.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Terry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Calder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Miles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. State v. EdenfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Loureiro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. J.X. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API