Legal Opinion

Mayhue v. Snell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Huron. Replevin. The facts are shown in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is an action of replevin to recover certain horses seized by Merrick from Mayhue under claim that he had about two weeks before sold them as sheriff on execution, but that he had then been prevented from delivering them by the interference of the coroner and others acting under a writ of replevin. Snell was the execution creditor and alleged purchaser, and Winsor his attorney.

This alleged sale was made March 24, 1876, and Merrick claims the property was bid off to Snell. No money was paid, and no delivery then made of the property. The payment on the bids is claimed to have been made by…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Irey v. GormanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co. v. ReidMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API