Legal Opinion

Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co. v. Reid

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1889Published

Error to Newaygo. (Fuller, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action of replevin was commenced in justice^ court, where it was tried before a jury, and defendant had verdict and judgment for costs. Plaintiff appealed to the circuit court, and upon a trial there before a jury the court directed verdict for plaintiff for nominal damages. Defendant brings error.

It appeared upon the trial that in June, 1887, the defendant, who was then a deputy-sheriff of Newaygo county, having an execution in his hands against the plaintiff, went to the office of the company at Fremont, in Newaygo county, and assumed to make a levy under his writ upon a letter-press…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickey v. HinsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. McHugh v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Mayhue v. SnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API