Legal Opinion

Application of Majestic Distilling Company, Inc

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 5, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8220Published

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 153 USPQ 884 (Abstract), affirming the examiner’s refusal to register “CHARRED KEG” as a trademark for whiskey on the ground that the mark is merely descriptive of applicant’s goods. (Section 2(e) (1) Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U. S.C. § 1052(e).) The board also said: “If said term were applied to a type of whiskey other than bourbon it could well be misdescriptive thereof.”

While appellant concedes that the mark is not purely arbitrary, it urges that it does not describe any ingredient, condition,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roselux Chemical Co., Inc., Bonnie-Lan, Inc., and Proxite Products, Inc. v. Parsons Ammonia Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Application of Colonial Stores IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. Application of Preformed Line Products CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of Walker Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API