Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Barnett
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 28, 1995No. 72A01-9504-CV-119PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Tony A. Doyle appeals the trial court's denial of his Ind.Trial Rule 60(B) motion which sought to set aside a default judgment entered against him. Specifically, Doyle argues that: 1) he did not receive proper service of appellee-plaintiff Lana G. Barnett's summons and complaint as required by Ind.Trial Rule 60(B)(6) and 2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to set aside the default judgment where he had a meritorious defense to the complaint.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to the judgment reveal that on March 20, 1998, Doyle and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marriage of Myers v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Grecco v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sherrill v. PettifordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Cornelius v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Baker v. Champion Motor Home Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Hill v. RameyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Shepard Ambulance, Inc. v. Helsell, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & HokansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Bonaventura v. LeachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Norris v. Personal FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.