Legal Opinion
Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. Gray
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 11, 1943No. 4-6948PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.
The question is, Did the court err in sustaining corporation commission’s finding that L. N. Gray 1 should be granted a certificate of convenience and necessity authorizing him to operate a bus line between Fordyce and Little Rock? 2
filed called for “closed doors” between Fordyce and Thornton.
Gray’s petition was filed April 18, 1940. He at that time was authorized to operate between El Dorado and Fordyce over highway 167. Highway seven (between El Dorado and Camden) and highway seventy-nine (between Camden and Thornton) were used by Missouri' Pacific Transportation Company. On them are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Missouri Pac. Railroad Co., Thompson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Gregory v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
3Cited by8 opinions
- Santee v. BradySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- North Little Rock Transportation Co. v. City of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Schulte v. Southern Bus LinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. Inter City Transit Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Arkansas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Batesville Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.