United States v. Mace
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska; Joseph W. Woodrough, Judge. Suit by the United States against W. W. Mace on a forfeited recognizance. Judgment for defendant, and the United States brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KENYON, Circuit Judge.
On or about July 18, 1918, Joseph Chenoweth, in pursuance of an information filed by the Assistant United States District Attorney for the district of Nebraska, accusing him of breaking and entering a certain railroad car engaged in interstate commerce with the intent to commit larceny therein, appeared before Robert D. Neely, United States commissioner for the district of Nebraska, waived examination and executed a certain written recognizance, with W. W. Mace as-surety for the appearance of said defendant Joseph Chenoweth to answer the charge in said complaint. As the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. KeiverU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1893
- United States v. SauerDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1896
- United States v. InsleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- La Grotta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Palermo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. DukeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925