Legal Opinion
United States v. Mayor and Council of City of Hoboken, NJ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 10, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
This is the return of a rule to show cause why a permanent restraining order should not issue. The rule was granted by one of the other judges of this court on ex parte motion. It was accompanied by a temporary restraint granting in full the prayer of the United States that certain property in the city of Hoboken be declared permanently tax-exempt. The facts are not in dispute. The North German Lloyd and the Hamburg-Ameriean Line, the two large German steamship companies operating from this country, acquired part of the bed of the North branch of the Hudson river. Such…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. CowardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- United States v. DreosDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
- Central R. v. MartinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1933
- Catholic Community Services v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
- Port Angeles Western R. v. Clallam CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930