Legal Opinion
Stolz v. Barker
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided August 10, 1978No. C-78-267-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HIRAM H. WARD, District Judge.
On July 28, 1978, the United States Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Thereafter the Court received plaintiff’s objections to the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation.
The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings, briefs, the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation and the plaintiff’s objections thereto. If this were an action based solely upon Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, plaintiff’s objections would be more persuasive. However, plaintiff’s claim is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- William Rodger Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGuire Arthur Everett Small, Jr. v. Honorable George L. Hart, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Schneider v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Foster v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Saleh v. Titan Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Kron Medical Corp. v. GrothDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Jordon v. Bowman Apple Products Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990
- Aliant Health Management Services, Inc. v. Vital Link Private Duty Lodi, Inc. (In Re Vital Link Lodi, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.