Legal Opinion

Love v. Vilsack

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 11, 2012No. Civil Action No. 00-2502 (RBW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in this civil action are female farmers who allege that the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) discriminated against them on the basis of gender by denying them “equal and fair access to farm loans and loan servicing, and of consideration of their administrative complaints.” Fourth Amended and Supplemental Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) at 3. Most relevant for present purposes, the plaintiffs also claim that the “USDA offered and is implementing voluntary administrative claims programs to adjudicate the claims of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Nyambal v. MnuchinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Love v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Allen-Denson v. RaimondoDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  5. Ayers v. Hargett (TV1)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API