Legal Opinion
Hughes County v. Henry
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1925No. File Nos. 5823, 5843PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.
Two cases are before’us by consolidation; one an original proceeding in mandamus, the other an appeal from the circuit court of Hughes county. We first consider the mandamus proceeding.
By chapter 333, Laws 1917, acting under an amendment to Constitution, art. 13, § 1, adopted by the people at the November, 1916, election, the state embarked in the business of making farm loans. That chapter as amended by chapter 334 of the same session, and as amended at the -Special Legislative Session of 1918 (chapter 58), appears in the Revised Code of 19119 as sections 10150 to 10173. Chapter 304, Laws…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Georgia v. City of ChattanoogaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Sanitary District of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Contributors to the Pennsylvania Hospital v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Citizens' Savings Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Board of County Com'rs of Woods County v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- In Re Bellman Farms, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
- State v. Board of Com'rs.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.