Legal Opinion
Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 12, 1996No. 14077PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The petitioner appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claims that the habeas court improperly required him to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by his counsel’s failure to file in a timely manner a petition for certification to appeal from the judgment dismissing his first habeas corpus petition. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The relevant facts are as follows. The petitioner, Michael Iovieno, was convicted of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70, unlawful restraint in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. PhiddConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Connecticut Car Rental, Inc. v. PatlaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997