Legal Opinion

Stott v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 8, 1945No. 45650PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge

The plaintiff, an officer in the Navy, claims that he was, for the period September 1, 1939 to July 17, 1942, the chief support of his mother, and should have been paid the increased rental and subsistence allowances which the statutes authorized for an officer with a dependent mother. The statutes relied on for the period before June 1, 1942, are Sections 4, 5, and 6 of the Act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 625, as amended by the Act of May 31, 1924, 43 Stat. 250. The pertinent statutory provisions for the period after June 1, 1942, are Sections 4, 5, and 6 of the Act of June 16, 1942, 56 Stat.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Freeland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Mumma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garcia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  2. StottUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API